The European Union is considering the possibility of providing Ukraine with profits from frozen Russian assets. We are talking about billions of dollars that our country could use for reconstruction or other needs. So far we see opposition to transferring these funds to Ukraine. Political scientist, head of the Center for Analysis and Strategies Igor Chalenko told Channel 24 about this, adding that in fact this could result in serious challenges for Europe. The seized funds of the Russian Central Bank should be confiscated and transferred to Ukraine for subsequent restoration. But we have the position of the European Central Bank, which believes that such decisions will become an element of instability and will lead to negative pressure on the euro. I cannot agree with this. I would like to remind you that Ukraine is an official candidate for membership in the European Union, that is, all restoration will take place within the framework of our European integration as a future full member of the EU,โ emphasized Igor Chalenko The European Central Bank must put this issue into perspective. The longer the funds are not used to restore Ukraine, the more expensive it will be. Even if we do not take into account new blows to infrastructure or the residential complex, this will happen due to inflation, rising prices for construction products, and rising payments in the relevant sector. It is important for the European community itself to make informed, correct and prompt decisions. Therefore, the fact that they are not doing this now is a wrong position that slows down the process,โ added the political scientist.Why are these funds not allocated to Ukraine
How do sanctions affect life in Russia
What does Europe risk by not confiscating Russian assets in favor of Ukraine?
76