On August 20, Daria Dugin, the daughter of the main ideologist of the Kremlin dictator Alexander Dugin, died near Moscow. It took the FSB only two days to “solve” the murder, blaming Ukraine for everything.
However, the version of the involvement of the Ukrainian special services is a path that will lead the investigation into a dead end. She is very unlikely. Gennady Gudkov, a Russian opposition leader, told channel 24 about this.
Complex murder
In his opinion, such a “special operation” is too complicated and unprofitable,after all, it involves surveillance, analysis of the lifestyle of the Dugin family, control over their movements, identification of their daughter, surveillance, etc. “It's a very big risk. Can you imagine the cost of failure?” – he suggested.
It's easier to hire a killer, says Gudkov, who will release the ball in the parking lot near the house or in the entrance, and then disappear.
I would I did not commit such a complex assassination attempt, realizing that the other side could expose me, and then it would be a serious blow to my image. – stressed the Russian opposition politician.
There are two versions
The first version is a sacred murder
According to Gudkov, there are several facts that indicate that the version of the “sacred victim” may be true:
- Camera off< /strong> in the parking lot.
- Margarita Semyan's hysteria in the media , which she staged not at the call of her soul, but on the orders of the Kremlin. “I know how dependent she is on the Kremlin, and how much she is entrusted with the face of the Kremlin, who gets the most important and does the dirtiest tasks,” he said.
- 3rd FSB call about Ukrainian citizen Natalya Vovka, suspected of murder. It's like she fled to Estonia, so Russia is demanding that she be brought to justice. “Why is this girl, where did she stick the explosives, where and what buttons did she press? This is not the point,” Gudkov emphasized.
I have this raises great suspicions,” the Russian oppositionist noted.
Obviously, in order to bring a person to justice, at least some (even indirect) evidence of the involvement of a certain citizen or citizen in a specific crime must be given. “Perhaps they argued because of the man,” Gudkov suggested.
The second version is “showdown”
Gudkov also considers the possibility of murder because all sorts of “showdowns” – financial, pro-government, for flows, programs, “kickbacks”, “raspel”, appointment of their own to positions. “Everything that negative, dirty and criminal happens every day on the territory of the so-called ‘Donetsk Republic’,” he said.
We know, he added, that all accounts are different there a gang from the 90s sits there with a friend and uses approaches that were popular at that time. he leans towards the version of a sacred murder.
