What is the role of Lytvyn in signing the Kharkiv agreements?/Channel 24 Collage
Former Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Justice should not be the only ones responsible for signing the Kharkiv Accords. Volodymyr Lytvyn also contributed to their ratification.
ShareFbTwiTelegramViberShareFbTwiTelegramViber
This was stated on Channel 24 by political scientist Mykola Davydyuk. According to him, Lytvyn, as the then chairman of the Verkhovna Rada, put these agreements to a vote.
Who should be responsible for the Kharkiv agreements
Davidyuk believes that all former officials involved in the preparation and ratification of the Kharkiv agreements should be held accountable.
I think Litvin was left for dessert, I guess. Obviously, this trinity is incomplete without him,” the political scientist noted.
He noted that the former Foreign Minister Konstantin Grishchenko dealt with the issue of concluding these agreements, and the ex-Minister of Justice Alexander Lavrynovych ratified them. And although Lytvyn tried to avoid it, after Yanukovych's call, he nevertheless put the Kharkiv agreements to a vote.
Therefore, Davidyuk is sure, Lytvyn should answer as a former speaker of parliament, who then played along with the state hostile to us. The same applies to all the staff of Yanukovych.
Mykola Davidyuk spoke about Lytvyn and the Kharkiv agreements: watch the video
“There was something for everyone”
The political scientist noted that the then authorities had their own approach to everyone who was somehow involved in the Kharkov agreements.
Well, blackmail. It is clear that there was something for everyone, he explained.
According to Davidyuk, some were blackmailed to promote these agreements, some received money, and some were motivated by political prospects.
Today, all these scoundrels need to be held accountable. War is the best time to cleanse the state,” the political scientist emphasized.
In his opinion, now it is necessary to throw all Russian agents into prison. After all, in 2014 they were already thrown into landfills, but this did not work.
Consequences of the signing of the Kharkiv agreements
Davidyuk emphasized that the state of Ukraine suffered as a result of the signing of the Kharkiv agreements.
They then led to the occupation of Crimea, to the campaign in Donbas and further attacks on Ukraine,” he said.
According to the political scientist, if they had not been signed then, we would not have such a situation now.
Pay attention!
strong>The Kharkiv agreements were signed by Viktor Yanukovych and Dmitry Medvedev in April 2010. According to them, the stay of the Russian Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol was extended by 25 years in exchange for a discount on gas. li> The suspects in the case of the Kharkov agreements Alexander Lavrinovich and Konstantin Grishchenko fled abroad. On July 25, they were informed of suspicion of high treason.
