The West is gradually moving to the position , in which it agrees that Ukraine can hit them with weapons at military targets on Russian territory. This was stated, in particular, by Emmanuel Macron and Olaf Scholz at a press conference. It also remains important that the United States make an appropriate decision. Political scientist Alexey Buryachenko told 24 Channel< /strong>that Ukraine has a lot of both Western weapons and weapons from the United States. In particular, those same ATACMS, both long-range and cluster munitions, are the most effective weapons that the military has, since the use of Storm Shadow/SCALP-EG missiles will not be able to protect Ukraine from a large, even hypothetical invasion. < /p> The political scientist believes that when these statements reach the final stage, something may change, but in general Ukraine will be able to hit targets that threaten it – fuel and lubricant bases, troop concentrations, etc., located far from front line. The list of legitimate targets against which Ukraine can respond with Western weapons, within the framework of international law, will be quite wide,” emphasized Alexey Buryachenko. Although the statement from Emmanuel Macron sounded quite radical, and from Olaf Scholz – quite restrained, a certain strategic uncertainty remains. their weapons against Russian military targets are already being actively promoted in the media and will influence decision-making in the United States of America. If both Britain and the countries of the European Union give such permission, then, most likely, the United States will also provide it, the political scientist said. He summed up, that our partners and allies are convinced that this should happen gradually, and Russia needs to be prepared for this decision for a certain period of time so as not to get a serious escalation, which Vladimir Putin constantly talks about. < h2 class="news-subtitle cke-markup" dir="ltr">Enemy losses: latest news
We need to prepare Russia
The list of targets is quite wide, – political scientist on the possibility of Western weapons striking Russia
46
