The Times criticized the scandalous report of Amnesty International/AFP
International human rights organization Amnesty International published a scandalous report on the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The Times said that no means could save her reputation.
ShareFbTwiTelegramViberShareFbTwiTelegramViber
The report, published on August 4, stated that the Ukrainian military was allegedly endangering civilians. They say that the Armed Forces of Ukraine are creating bases and using weapons in residential areas, including schools and hospitals.
Amnesty International has destroyed its credibility
The Times noted that this week Amnesty International set out decisively to destroy its credibility by serving as a mouthpiece for Putin's propaganda. After all, according to the Geneva Convention, legal obligations to protect civilians in time of war are by no means blaming and denigrating the victims of aggression, which is what the organization does
It is not surprising that the Ukrainian office of the organization, with who were not consulted, denounced these alleged findings, while the Russian embassy in London willingly recreated them, The Times noted.
The publication added that the fighters of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are based in civilian areas, since the Russians are attacking them. This method of infidels is already known in general, because it was used not only in Ukraine, but also in Chechnya and Syria.
“Ukrainian forces courageously resist these invaders, while trying to help civilians leave dangerous areas,” the journalists emphasized. .
At the same time, Amnesty International ignored the realities of hostilities and misunderstood the content of international law.
The organization showed softness towards aggression and fascism.
The Times recalled that Amnesty International had previously humiliated itself in front of the Kremlin. The organization has refused to recognize Russian opposition leader Aleksey Navalnav as a prisoner of conscience, that is, a person who is persecuted and often arrested for peacefully expressing his political views. After a flurry of international criticism, this statement was retracted.
“Amnesty apparently did not learn anything from this fiasco. General Secretary Agnes Callamard complained that the group was criticized on social networks as if she was some kind of offended party, and that her frivolous feuilleton about Ukraine has the status of sacred scripture,” the journalists added.
Despite the fact that in any serious non-governmental organization the secretary general would have resigned, the reputation of Amnesty International can no longer be saved by any means.
“When the respected humanitarian organization Amnesty now demonstrates a pathetic indifference to oppression,” The Times emphasized.
Journalists summed up that, having shown their softness towards crime and fascism, the organization “should have the decency to leave the stage”.
