Russia Will Certainly Fall Apart: Oppositionist Names Prerequisites for This Process

Russia will inevitably fall apart: oppositionist named the prerequisites for this process Petro Sineokiy

Russia does not bring anything viable and positive to humanity. This structure must be completely destroyed, which is where it is heading.

About this 24 ChannelRussian opposition journalist Igor Yakovenko said, noting that there will be no “wonderful Russia of the future” that some so-called “oppositionists” dream of. The “Russia” project has long since exhausted itself.

Russia Will Disintegrate

As Yakovenko noted, Russia was already moving towards its end. And the full-scale war against Ukraine only brought this process closer.

We see the agony of Russia. It is a monster that has nothing viable. It brings only murders. There is no mechanism for transforming what is now on the territory called Russia into something good. Such a mechanism does not exist. There is a mechanism of disintegration, – Yakovenko emphasized.

It is clear that during the disintegration of Russia, tragic events may occur on the territory of the aggressor country itself. But this is much better than if it could preserve itself in its current form. The disintegration of Russia will be a blessing for hundreds of millions of people.

In this context, it is strange to read the statement of Yulia Navalnaya's widow, who was outraged by the idea of ​​decolonizing Russia and talked nonsense about people “with a common background.” This shows that neither she nor her people understand at all what Russia is.

This entire Navalny team has lost its “head.” Navalny was, after all, a person who reflected. He had different periods in his life, different views, many of which were not close to me. But he was a person who was capable of changing his position. In the last period of his life, he wrote important texts where he changed his position. With his death, his team takes Navalny's old ideas and tries to hold on to some of them. They become “pedants”. They hold on to old “dogmas” that do not take into account new situations, – Yakovenko noted.