Hitler's role in the modern world can be shared with Putin/Getty Images
Wise Ukrainian Facebook, it's time to heal from the Chinese disease, and politicians/officials/public figures/media from red envelopes.
It's time be realistic
It is enough to believe in the Kremlin-Chinese fairy tales about “China just wants a piece of Siberia” or “you need to know how to deal with China”, or “China's neutrality suits us”.
No and there was no neutrality of the PRC in this war. China has been and remains on the side of Russia. He is her overlord. And if we compare it with World War II, then I would still give the role of Hitler to Xi, the role of Putin is more like Mussolini.
Read what State Department Spokesperson Ned Price has to say about this: “We've talked quite a lot about coherence and partnership between China and Russia, in particular in recent weeks. Secretary Blinken noted this in his recent speech about our approach to China. To put it bluntly, we worries about China's alliance with Russia.
We noted the PRC's statement that China is neutral, but its behavior, its rhetoric, its actions suggest that this is not the case. ties with Russia We have seen this since the early days of the conflict, even before it.
While Russia was amassing its forces along Ukraine's borders, President Xi on February 4, about three weeks before the start of the invasion, when it was clear what could happen, decided to announce what China and Russia called a “partnership without limits.”
>
The New World Order of Dictators
And in a joint statement following the 5,000-word meeting of these two world leaders, they put forward a vision of a profoundly illiberal world order, profoundly different from the vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific and other regions that the United States and our partners not only defended, but also sought to promote and protect.
The vision they put forward is a world where force makes right, a world where – contrary to decades of PRC claims of the inviolability of state sovereignty – big states can oppress small states, where countries cannot choose their own partnerships, pursue their own foreign policy, where, in many ways, coercion is the name of the game.
So in key ways, despite what we hear from the PRC taking a position of declared and perceived neutrality, the PRC has already made its choice.
And now for more than three months (since Russia invaded Ukraine) China – despite the atrocities committed, despite the violence, despite the loss of life, despite the global consequences, given the lack of food security not only in the region, but also beyond – China still prefers to support Russia.
Choosing the side of evil
He still repeats Russian propaganda. It is very disturbing that he is repeating and spreading very dangerous Russian lies on many fronts.
PRC and Russia, of course, continue to shirk their commitments as members of the Permanent Five. The fact that the PRC continues to largely deny the atrocities that took place in Ukraine – the atrocities that we saw with our own eyes, thanks to the reports of many of your organizations – I think speaks of the partnership and the choice that the PRC has made.
We certainly saw the recent telephone conversation between the two leaders. Again, this position of declared neutrality on the part of the PRC is nothing more than an empty statement.
If the PRC really believed in the principles that it has defended for many years, including in the UN Security Council, then the approach , which we would observe from the side of the PRC, would be noticeably different from what we are seeing now.
