The possibility of transfer Russia's frozen assets to Ukraine. There is no solution yet, but propagandists are already hysterical about it. About this Channel 24< /strong> said international political scientist Ruslan Osipenko, noting that even at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, a different logic was applied to Russia. She was considered a more or less decent member of the international community, so the transfer of these assets was delayed. Now the situation is somewhat different. The logic in relation to Russia has changed. The transfer of frozen Russian assets is beginning to be seen as one of the tools for delivering a geopolitical strike and defeat. It is necessary for Russia to finally realize that it is an aggressor. As Osipenko noted, Russian propagandists are already making threats, claiming that there will be no transfer of assets. Like, if the West wanted, it would have done all this at the beginning of a full-scale war. Also, such actions may lead to distrust in the dollar and euro. Indeed, Russian propaganda is trying to put pressure so that the transfer of assets does not happen. Here we need to work through counter-propaganda. I think that in response counter-propaganda should explain that Russia, which does not comply with international rules, has no right to protect private property. She is the aggressor. She changes boundaries by force and does not recognize norms. And in 2020, they amended the Constitution, recognizing that their national law prevails over international law. If a country has created such a framework for itself, then why demand that international law be applied to it and its assets abroad be protected? – Osipenko emphasized.
Propagandists are trying to intimidate
What is known about Russia's assets abroad: briefly
Geopolitical blow: propagandists are hysterical over the possible transfer of frozen assets to Ukraine
54
