Three possible versions of how drones flew to Pskov/Channel 24 Collage On the night of August 30, unknown drones attacked the Russian airfield in Pskov, where military transport aircraft were destroyed. Russian propagandists said that it was supposedly a blow from NATO member countries. All versions of the event put forward by the occupiers are bad for them. This Channel 24 was told by military expert Denis Popovich, noting that this situation shows the true level of Russian air defense. Even assuming that the drones were flying from those states, which are located near the city of Pskov, for example, Estonia or Latvia, which are members of the Alliance, then the question arises why there was no response from Russia to such “aggression”. Even if in a nightmare to assume that the missiles were flying from NATO member countries, then the question arises, where are the ballistic missiles, which in response were supposed to hit NATO countries, deal them a crushing blow, knock out NATO troops from the borders with Russia? – said Denis Popovich. Such a response from Russia should have finally demonstrated the so-called “superiority” of Russian weapons over Western ones, but all this is not. What other red lines should I draw? Where is the reaction? The version of a strike with NATO is really bad,” Popov stressed. The military expert named 3 possible versions of how the drones reached the Russian airport: watch the video “
Denis Popov called this version even worse for the Russians, because then they would have to admit that Russian air defense is not capable of repelling attacks, not only from NATO countries, but even from the territory of Ukraine. In addition, there was no readiness to repel air strikes over Pskov at all. This is also very bad, because their air defense is not ready to cover the territory from air strikes. And over Pskov, I didn’t see a single hint of air defense at all, since these drones were shot down with the help of small arms,” a military expert noted. Perhaps it is not Ukraine or NATO that is to blame for the drone strikes. But then you need to accept the fact of the existence of partisan groups or units that can strike from Russian territory at their own strategic airfields. Where is their counterintelligence then, where are the secret services? Wherever you look, whatever version you come up with, everything is very bad for the Russians,” Denis Popov summed up.
< li> On the morning of August 31 in Moscow, they again announced an attack by drones and blocked the airports. Therefore, the “Carpet” plan was announced, more than 40 flights were delayed, and some of them were canceled altogether.
First version – “strike by NATO”
Third version – launch from Russia
For Russia, all versions are bad: how drones could fly to Pskov
24
