< strong _ngcontent-sc139>At a recent meeting with the heads of Russian municipalities, Vladimir Putin complained about Ukraine’s peace formula. The dictator used the word “morons” in relation to the political leadership of Ukraine, which is why his speech resembled the claims of a child to adults. Such a thought with 24 Channel was shared by political strategist Mikhail Sheitelman. He suggested that Putin was resentful that Russia had no representation at the world economic forum in Davos. In his speech, the Russian dictator placed special emphasis on the fact that Ukraine allegedly “forced” the West to abandon communications with Moscow. However, it is important to remember that the Ukrainian ban on negotiations with the aggressor actually only states their impossibility with President Putin. The day before, another meeting took place in Davos to discuss the Ukrainian peace formula. Its first point about the liberation of all occupied territories is unacceptable for Putin personally, who will definitely not dare to withdraw Russian troops from the occupied Crimea and Donbass. “What was (Putin's meeting with the leaders municipalities – Channel 24)? This was an alternative to Davos. Putin understands that for the second year in a row he is “flying” past (this prestigious forum – Channel 24) and that he is not welcome there. The same is with his other “bandits” like Germanov Grefov (head of Sberbank – Channel 24) or Sergeev Sobyatinykh (Mayor of Moscow – Channel 24),” noted the political scientist. However, the Russian dictator's response to the Davos forum turned out to be quite “childish”, because his wording and questions raised at the meeting looked extremely hilarious compared to the scale of Davos, where the most influential people in the world discuss truly pressing problems. Putin’s speech had no less resonance with the remark that The Kremlin will under no circumstances give up its “conquests” in Ukraine. It should be understood that this is not the first time that the Russian dictator has used this particular word to refer to the occupied territories of Ukraine. Accordingly, this is not a “reservation” at all. For example, meeting on January 1 with some wounded Russian soldiers, Putin said: “What you captured, we cannot give back, otherwise it will turn out that you wasted your lives and health on these conquests,” recalled Sheitelman. It is noteworthy that similar opinions were also repeatedly expressed by Dmitry Medvedev and Sergei Lavrov, who insisted that negotiations are possible only if the parties retain controlled territories. But now that Putin has voiced this opinion publicly, it has actually become “documented” and any Western politician can refer to it. “If Ukraine now signs any agreement with Russia ( as a result of which Russia will get what it wants – Channel 24), then tomorrow the aggressor will be able to attack in the same way. After all, the conditions (of aggression against an independent state – Channel 24) will not change. It turns out that Russia recognizes the right to conquer any territory,” explained the logic occupiers political strategist. Accordingly, wanting to preserve its gains, the Kremlin directly denies international law. And in this case, it is impossible to create any legal framework for reaching any agreements with the Putin regime.What Putin's latest whining means
Why it’s wise not to start negotiations with Russia
What were the Ukrainian events of the forum in Davos
Complained and snapped: how Putin showed his worthlessness in his last speech
50
